Partisan Agenda Control and the Dimensionality of Congress
35 Pages Posted: 1 Sep 2009 Last revised: 17 May 2011
Date Written: April 24, 2011
Abstract
Recent scholarship has questioned the familiar characterization of congressional voting as unidimensional (Crespin and Rohde 2007; Roberts et al. 2008). We build on these efforts by showing how a simple type of agenda control can suppress a latent second dimension. We argue that attempts to keep the majority party unified can lead to the estimation of more vertical cut lines and prevent the revelation of ideological differences along a second dimension. We evaluate this argument by examining the relationship between cut line angles and various measures of party control for all recorded roll call votes in the House of Representatives from 1875 to 1997. We also examine the relationship between measures of a second dimension and majority party unity in congress level regression. Our findings help to explain why a single dimension might explain a large amount of the variance in voting data when latent ideology is multidimensional.
Keywords: ideal points, dimensions, congress
JEL Classification: H1
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in Ideal Point Estimates Via the Parametric Bootstrap
By Jeffrey B. Lewis and Keith T. Poole
-
Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in DW-NOMINATE Ideal Point Estimates via the Parametric Bootstrap
By Royce Carroll, Jeffrey B. Lewis, ...
-
Comparing Nominate and Ideal: Points of Difference and Monte Carlo Tests
By Royce Carroll, Jeffrey B. Lewis, ...
-
By Simon Hix, Bjorn Hoyland, ...
-
The Unidimensional Congress, 1919-84
By Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal
-
Scaling Roll Call Votes with W-NOMINATE in R
By Keith T. Poole, Jeffrey B. Lewis, ...
-
Ideological Extremism, Branding, and Electoral Design: Multimember versus Single-Member Districts
-
By Michael C. Brady and David W. Rohde