Past Experience and Methods of Territorial Dispute Resolution
44 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2009 Last revised: 30 Sep 2009
Date Written: 2009
Abstract
Does past win/loss record impact states’ subsequent choices of peaceful dispute resolution methods? We present a theory that portrays peaceful resolution of disputes as an effect of strategic forum shopping. During the process of decision making, each state strategically chooses between several forums; its final choice of a method is strongly based on the state’s past experience with this particular method. Empirical analysis of all attempts at peaceful resolution of territorial disputes from 1945-2003 shows that states use their record of victories and failures as an indicator of the probability of winning in a subsequent dispute. In general however, the link between past experience and choice of a resolution method follows different patterns for challenger and target states. For example, past win/loss record matters most for the challenger states that want to repeatedly resort to binding methods of peaceful resolution – arbitration and adjudication. Target states, on the other hand, place greatest trust in their experience with nonbinding third party methods.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Adjudicating in Anarchy: An Expressive Theory of International Dispute Resolution
By Tom Ginsburg and Richard H. Mcadams
-
Almost Consistent Estimation of Panel Probit Models with 'Small' Fixed Effects
By Francois Laisney and Michael Lechner
-
Somber Reflections on the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court
-
International Dispute Settlement and the Role of International Adjudication
-
Judicial Behavior Behind Mask and Shield: Modeling the European Court of Justice