Delaying the Buck: Timing, Uncertainty, and Appropriations Outcomes

22 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2009 Last revised: 17 Apr 2012

Sarah Anderson

University of California, Santa Barbara - Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management

Jonathan Woon

University of Pittsburgh

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

How do the dynamics of executive-legislative bargaining affect policy outcomes? This project examines the relationship between the duration of the appropriations process and budgetary outcomes in order to assess the relative importance of congressional actors and the sources of tension between them. We analyze whether longer delays at various stages of the process result in greater concessions to the president or to greater volatility in outcomes. We find that delay is associated with greater concessions to the president, but not with volatility, suggesting that the uncertainty in bargaining is uncertainty regarding the president’s position. We also find that the House concedes more to presidents who prefer less spending and that the Senate is more responsive to presidential needs during presidential election years.

Suggested Citation

Anderson, Sarah and Woon, Jonathan, Delaying the Buck: Timing, Uncertainty, and Appropriations Outcomes (2009). APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1450649

Sarah Anderson (Contact Author)

University of California, Santa Barbara - Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management ( email )

4670 Physical Sciences North
Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5131
United States

Jonathan Woon

University of Pittsburgh ( email )

4600 Posvar Hall
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.pitt.edu/~woon

Paper statistics

Downloads
44
Abstract Views
571