Party and Constituency Influence on Procedural and Final Passage Voting in the U.S. House

Posted: 13 Aug 2009 Last revised: 3 Sep 2009

See all articles by Stephen Jessee

Stephen Jessee

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Sean M. Theriault

University of Texas at Austin - Department of Government

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

Most analyses of congressional voting, whether theoretical or empirical, treat all roll call votes in the same way. We argue that such approaches mask considerable variation in voting behavior across different categories of votes. An examination of all recorded roll call votes in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1993 to 2008 reveals that members’ voting behavior on procedural and final passage matters have become increasingly differentiated. We show that party has become increasingly important relative to constituency in dictating members’ voting behavior, especially on procedural votes. These trends can account for much of the partisan polarization that has occurred during this time period.

Suggested Citation

Jessee, Stephen and Theriault, Sean M., Party and Constituency Influence on Procedural and Final Passage Voting in the U.S. House (2009). APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1451204

Stephen Jessee

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Sean M. Theriault (Contact Author)

University of Texas at Austin - Department of Government ( email )

College of Liberal Arts
1 University Station A1800
Austin, TX 78712
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
451
PlumX Metrics