Red Brain, Blue Brain: Evaluative Processes Differ in Democrats and Republicans
15 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2009 Last revised: 5 Sep 2009
Date Written: 2009
Abstract
We matched public voter records to 54 subjects who performed a risk-taking task during functional imaging. We find that Democrats and Republicans had significantly different patterns of brain activation during processing of risky decisions. Amygdala activations, associated with externally directed reactions to risk, are stronger in Republicans, while insula activations, associated with internally directed reactions to affective perceptions, are stronger in Democrats. These results suggest an internal vs. external difference in evaluative process that illuminates and resolves a discrepancy in the existing literature. This process-based approach to political partisanship is distinct from the policy-based approach that has dominated research for at least the past half century. In fact, a two parameter model of partisanship based on amygdala and insula activations achieves better accuracy in predicting whether someone is a Democrat or a Republican than a well established model in political science based on parental socialization of party identification.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Estimating the Probability of Events that Have Never Occured: When is Your Vote Decisive?
By Andrew Gelman, Gary King, ...
-
Beyond the Self: Social Identity, Altruism, and Political Participation
By James H. Fowler and Cindy D. Kam
-
Voting as a Rational Choice: Why and How People Vote to Improve the Well-Being of Others
By Aaron S. Edlin, Andrew Gelman, ...
-
Genetic Variation in Political Participation
By James H. Fowler, Laura A. Baker, ...
-
Friendships Moderate an Association Between a Dopamine Gene Variant and Political Ideology
By Jaime Settle, Christopher T. Dawes, ...
-
The Heritability of Partisan Attachment
By Jaime Settle, Christopher T. Dawes, ...