15 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2009 Last revised: 5 Sep 2009
Date Written: 2009
We matched public voter records to 54 subjects who performed a risk-taking task during functional imaging. We find that Democrats and Republicans had significantly different patterns of brain activation during processing of risky decisions. Amygdala activations, associated with externally directed reactions to risk, are stronger in Republicans, while insula activations, associated with internally directed reactions to affective perceptions, are stronger in Democrats. These results suggest an internal vs. external difference in evaluative process that illuminates and resolves a discrepancy in the existing literature. This process-based approach to political partisanship is distinct from the policy-based approach that has dominated research for at least the past half century. In fact, a two parameter model of partisanship based on amygdala and insula activations achieves better accuracy in predicting whether someone is a Democrat or a Republican than a well established model in political science based on parental socialization of party identification.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Schreiber, Darren M. and Simmons, Alan N. and Dawes, Christopher T. and Flagan, Taru and Fowler, James H. and Paulus, Martin P., Red Brain, Blue Brain: Evaluative Processes Differ in Democrats and Republicans (2009). APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1451867