Shell Games: On the Value of Shell Companies
52 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2009 Last revised: 20 Sep 2011
Date Written: March 7, 2011
Abstract
A reverse merger allows a private company to assume the current reporting status of another company that is public. This can be done quickly, without fundraising, road show, underwriter, substantial ownership dilution, or great expense. Private firms that go public via reverse merger are often motivated by the need to quickly secure financing through privately placed stock (PIPEs) and the desire to make acquisitions using stock as payment. In each of the last eight years reverse mergers have outnumbered traditional IPOs as a mechanism for going public, and reporting shell companies are providing fuel for much of this growth. We study 585 trading shell companies over the period 2006-2008. The purpose of most of these shell firms is to find a suitor for a reverse merger agreement. These companies have no systematic risk, operations, or assets, and their share price tends to decline over time. Yet, these firms have investors. When a takeover agreement is consummated, shell company three-month abnormal returns are 48.1%. We argue that this exceptional return is compensation to investors for shell stock illiquidity and the uncertainty of finding a reverse merger suitor. We show that shell company returns are much greater at the consummation of a merger than those of a similar entity that in dollar terms is more popular among investors — Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs).
Keywords: Shell Company, Reverse Merger, Reverse Takeover, Reverse Acquisition, Alternative Asset, SPACs, PIPEs
JEL Classification: G12, G24, G30
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Financing Under Extreme Risk: Contract Terms and Returns to Private Investments in Public Equity
By Susan Chaplinsky and David Haushalter
-
Does Investor Identity Matter in Equity Issues? Evidence from Private Placements
By Srinivasan Krishnamurthy, Paul A. Spindt, ...
-
By Na Dai
-
The Choice of Equity Selling Mechanisms: PIPES versus SEOS
By Hsuan‐chi Chen, Na Dai, ...
-
The Quality and Price of Investment Banks' Service: Evidence from the PIPE Market
-
By Kimberly C. Gleason, Ravi Jain, ...
-
By Karen H. Wruck and Yilin Wu
-
By Ioannis V. Floros and Kuldeep Shastri