Understanding the Federal Tort Claims Act: A Different Metaphor

Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, Vol. 44, p. 1105, 2009

American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2009-25

35 Pages Posted: 28 Aug 2009  

Paul Figley

American University - Washington College of Law

Abstract

When it enacted the Federal Tort Claims Act Congress waived the United States’ sovereign immunity for certain torts of the federal government. That waiver is subject to exclusions, exceptions, and limitations that may seem puzzling or counterintuitive. This essay explains the structure and operation of the Federal Tort Claims Act by comparing it to “a traversable bridge across the moat of sovereign immunity” (a metaphor used by Judge Max Rosenn in a slightly different context). The essay examines why Congress enacted the FTCA, the jurisdictional grant that allows some tort claims but not others, the pre-requisites to bringing suit, the exceptions Congress wrote into the FTCA, and other statutes that limit tort suits against the United States.

Keywords: Federal Tort Claims Act, Sovereign Immunity, FTCA

Suggested Citation

Figley, Paul, Understanding the Federal Tort Claims Act: A Different Metaphor. Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, Vol. 44, p. 1105, 2009 ; American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2009-25. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1463340

Paul Figley (Contact Author)

American University - Washington College of Law ( email )

4300 Nebraska Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20016
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
232
Rank
107,928
Abstract Views
1,450