Analyzing Experimental Data Using Regression: When is Bias a Practical Concern?
29 Pages Posted: 15 Oct 2009 Last revised: 21 May 2011
Date Written: March 7, 2011
Abstract
Experimental researchers routinely use regression in order to control for pre-treatment covariates. This practice has become controversial in the wake of recent demonstrations showing that this type of regression is prone to bias in small samples. Bias may even remain when units are sampled from a larger population of infnite size. This paper uses a combination of simulated and actual examples to show that, as a practical matter, bias tends to be negligible when the sample size is greater than 20. When bias does occur, it tends to be small in relation to the standard error of the estimated average treatment effect.
Keywords: regression analysis, David Freedman, experiments, statistical analysis
JEL Classification: C90, C00
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
By James J. Heckman, Hidehiko Ichimura, ...
-
Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non-Experimental Causal Studies
By Rajeev H. Dehejia and Sadek Wahba
-
Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non-Experimental Causal Studies
By Rajeev H. Dehejia and Sadek Wahba
-
Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training Programs
By Orley Ashenfelter and David Card
-
Causal Effects in Non-Experimental Studies: Re-Evaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs
By Rajeev H. Dehejia and Sadek Wahba
-
Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review
-
The Role of the Propensity Score in Estimating Dose-Response Functions
-
Does Matching Overcome Lalonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?
By Jeffrey A. Smith and Petra Todd