The American Inquisition: Sentencing after the Federal Guidelines

78 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2009 Last revised: 1 May 2010

Date Written: September 5, 2009

Abstract

Despite the series of important Supreme Court sentencing decisions of the past ten years, federal sentencing remains fundamentally inquisitorial. Although the guidelines are no longer legally binding, they continue to taint the entire federal criminal justice system by needlessly discouraging defendants from exercising their trial right and pressuring them to confess. Their continued vitality is largely due to Justice Breyer’s persistent view, first as one of the architects of the original guidelines and later as a Supreme Court justice, that sentencing is an administrative problem requiring an administrative solution. The heart of this solution is that the facts of each case and the appropriate punishment are to be determined not through the parties’ competing presentations, but through a probation officer’s purportedly 'neutral' investigation. This method of resolving factual issues, together with the guidelines’ harsh penalties for invoking the right to trial and lavish rewards for incriminating others, result in a system that is not only unfair but also intrinsically incompatible with our adversarial system of justice.

Existing scholarship on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines has not examined how the guidelines purposefully discourage exercise of the right to trial and pressure defendants to admit to every allegation against them (and others). The central role that the United States Probation Office plays has also not been thoroughly examined. Far from undertaking merely ministerial and innocuous tasks, as most of the existing scholarship assumes, probation officers are tasked by the guidelines with the most critical role at sentencing. Often, they exert far greater influence on case outcomes than defense lawyers and prosecutors. The article concludes that the present sentencing process is unconstitutional but can be easily reformed by restoring control over each case to the parties.

Keywords: Sentencing, Federal Sentencing Guidelines

JEL Classification: K14, K41

Suggested Citation

Bascuas, Ricardo J., The American Inquisition: Sentencing after the Federal Guidelines (September 5, 2009). Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 45, pp. 1-78, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1468887

Ricardo J. Bascuas (Contact Author)

University of Miami - School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 248087
Coral Gables, FL 33146
United States
305-284-2672 (Phone)
305-284-1588 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.miami.edu/facadmin/faculty/rbascuas.html

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
203
rank
146,335
Abstract Views
1,594
PlumX Metrics