Factor Adjustment, Quality Change, and Productivity Growth for U.S. Manufacturing
44 Pages Posted: 24 May 1999 Last revised: 17 Oct 2022
Date Written: January 1999
Abstract
This paper accounts for quality improvements and adjustment costs in all inputs to U.S. manufacturing production. Adjustment processes for non-capital inputs are slower than previously recognized. Annual adjustment percentages are: labor 77, capital 30, energy 20, and materials 21. Factor prices should be adjusted for quality improvements to reflect higher marginal products. The percentage increases in marginal products from quality improvements are: labor 0.25, capital 0.30, energy 2.13, and materials 0.92. Observed input growth should be adjusted for quality improvements. Unadjusted input growth causes efficiency-based productivity growth rates to exceed observed productivity growth in the slowdown period of 1974 - 1995.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Resurgence of Growth in the Late 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story?
-
Does the "New Economy" Measure Up to the Great Inventions of the Past?
-
Energy Efficiency, User Cost Changes, and the Measurement of Durable Goods Prices
-
Information Technology and the U.S. Productivity Revival: What Do the Industry Data Say?
-
Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence
By Erik Brynjolfsson and Lorin M. Hitt
-
Economic Growth in the OECD Area: Recent Trends at the Aggregate and Sectoral Level
By Stefano Scarpetta, Andrea Bassanini, ...