Mock Jurors' Reactions to Selective Presentation of Evidence from Multiple-Opportunity Searches

Law & Human Behavior, Vol. 30, No. 455-468, 2006

14 Pages Posted: 9 Sep 2009 Last revised: 7 Feb 2011

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

Prior to trial, litigants sometimes conduct broad investigations in which there are multiple opportunities to find supportive evidence by chance alone. During trial, litigants may selectively present only the most helpful evidence uncovered by their investigations. Two experiments examined whether mock jurors appreciate that the evidence they hear at trial may be a selective and unrepresentative sample of underlying facts. The data suggest that people do understand the significance of multiple-opportunity searches for legal inference. However, they may not consider the possibility that evidence was strategically selected from a larger sample space of facts unless that sample space is identified.

Keywords: Selection, Juror bias, Juror decision making

Suggested Citation

Koehler, Jonathan J. and Thompson, William C., Mock Jurors' Reactions to Selective Presentation of Evidence from Multiple-Opportunity Searches (2006). Law & Human Behavior, Vol. 30, No. 455-468, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1469649

Jonathan J. Koehler (Contact Author)

Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

William C. Thompson

University of California, Irvine - Department of Criminology, Law and Society ( email )

Irvine, CA
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
626
rank
387,662
PlumX Metrics