DNA Matches and Statistics: Important Questions, Surprising Answers

Judicature, Vol. 76, pp. 222-229, 1993

8 Pages Posted: 9 Sep 2009 Last revised: 17 May 2014

Date Written: November 23, 1992


Since its introduction at trial in a Florida case in 1987, DNA profiling evidence has been used to find against defendants in more than a thousand criminal and civil cases. The technique initially was received by the courts and news media as a nearly foolproof means of identifying vicious criminals who left blood, hair, or semen at the scenes of their crimes, as well as biological fathers implicated in paternity lawsuits. There is now an increased awareness that DNA analyses are subject to error and more deserving of careful scrutiny. This article asks and answers questions about the process involved in reporting DNA matches and their probative value. The validity of the underlying genetic theory is not questioned here. Instead, the focus is on the meaning and significance of reported matches, and the role the possibility of error should play in evaluating this evidence. These issues are not well understood by judges, attorneys, jurors, or, in many cases, DNA experts themselves.

Keywords: DNA, match statistics, probability

Suggested Citation

Koehler, Jonathan J., DNA Matches and Statistics: Important Questions, Surprising Answers (November 23, 1992). Judicature, Vol. 76, pp. 222-229, 1993. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1469659

Jonathan J. Koehler (Contact Author)

Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics