The Misquantification of Probative Value

Law & Human Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 645-659, December 2003

Penn State Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16-2009

16 Pages Posted: 11 Sep 2009 Last revised: 28 Oct 2009

See all articles by Jonathan J. Koehler

Jonathan J. Koehler

Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law

David H. Kaye

PSU - Penn State Law (University Park); ASU - College of Law & School of Life Sciences

Abstract

D. Davis and W.C. Follette (2002) purport to show that when “the base rate” for a crime is low, the probative value of “characteristics known to be strongly associated with the crime…will be virtually nil”. Their analysis rests on the choice of an arbitrary and inapposite measure of the probative value of evidence. When a more suitable metric is used (e.g., a likelihood ratio), it becomes clear that evidence they would dismiss as devoid of probative value is relevant and diagnostic.

Keywords: Evidence, inference, probative value

Suggested Citation

Koehler, Jonathan J. and Kaye, David H., The Misquantification of Probative Value. Law & Human Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 645-659, December 2003, Penn State Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16-2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1469676

Jonathan J. Koehler (Contact Author)

Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

David H. Kaye

PSU - Penn State Law (University Park)

Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.personal.psu.edu/dhk3/index.htm

ASU - College of Law & School of Life Sciences ( email )

111 E Taylor St.
Phoenix, AZ 85004
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.personal.psu.edu/dhk3/index.htm

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
83
Abstract Views
1,185
rank
325,049
PlumX Metrics