Governing the Presidential Nomination Commons

46 Pages Posted: 10 Sep 2009  

Brigham Daniels

Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: September, 10 2009

Abstract

The presidential primary system is plagued by states jockeying to hold primaries and caucuses as early as possible. While the trend of racing to vote is not new, it has increased alarmingly. In 2008, more than half the states held contests by the first week of February. This free-for-all hurts the democratic process by encouraging uninformed voting, emphasizing the role of money in campaigns, and pressing candidates to rely on sound-bite campaigning. Because the presidential nomination is one of the most important decisions left to voters in the United States, this problem is well-recognized. It is also widely misunderstood. This article casts the problem in a different light, demonstrating that frontloading of the nomination process is a classic tragedy of the commons. Recognizing the problem as a commons dilemma provides a powerful explanation for the trend toward earlier primaries and, more importantly, provides insights into how best to reform the nomination system.

Keywords: Frontloading, presidential primary, commons, common-pool resources, tragedy of the commons

Suggested Citation

Daniels, Brigham, Governing the Presidential Nomination Commons (September, 10 2009). Tulane Law Review, Vol. 84, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1471419

Brigham Daniels (Contact Author)

Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )

410 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
Rank
130,515
Abstract Views
495