Why the Supreme Court Changed its Mind About Government Aid to Religious Institutions: It’s a Lot More than Just Republican Appointments

19 Pages Posted: 11 Sep 2009

See all articles by Douglas Laycock

Douglas Laycock

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: September 11, 2009

Abstract

Government aid to religious schools can be governed by either of two principles: no aid to religion, or no discrimination among schools. No aid dominated in the 1970s because of lingering anti-Catholicism, the perception that school aid was just a Catholic issue, and fear of undermining desegregation of public schools. No discrimination came to dominate after 1985 because both anti-Catholicism and the desegregation effort faded away; evangelicals and black parents switched sides; and free marketers joined in to make a broad coalition for aid to private schools. These changes reframed the issue as one of individual choice for many Americans, bringing the no-discrimination principle to the fore and pushing the no-aid principle to the background. This article briefly reviews the social changes that set up the doctrinal change.

Keywords: Religious liberty, Establishment Clause, financial aid

JEL Classification: I29

Suggested Citation

Laycock, Douglas, Why the Supreme Court Changed its Mind About Government Aid to Religious Institutions: It’s a Lot More than Just Republican Appointments (September 11, 2009). Brigham Young University Law Review, Forthcoming, U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 159, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1472097

Douglas Laycock (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
154
Abstract Views
1,527
Rank
338,107
PlumX Metrics