Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=1472247
 


 



Source of Information or 'Dog and Pony Show'?: Judicial Information Seeking During U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument, 1963-1965 & 2004-2009


James Cleith Phillips


University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, Students

Edward Carter


Brigham Young University

September 10, 2009

Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 50, pp. 101-203, 2010

Abstract:     
Scholars and lawyers have long debated what role, if any, oral argument plays in the U.S. Supreme Court's decision-making process. While some have attempted anecdotally to determine whether or not Justices use oral argument to gather information in order to decide a case, few have attempted to investigate oral argument empirically. Additionally, no scholar to date has specifically measured the levels of information-seeking behavior during oral argument of individual Justices. Finally, there have been few studies attempting to quantitatively compare oral argument behavior in different time periods. This study attempts to address such deficiencies in Supreme Court scholarship.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 104

Keywords: oral argument, Supreme Court


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 15, 2009 ; Last revised: June 22, 2011

Suggested Citation

Phillips, James Cleith and Carter, Edward, Source of Information or 'Dog and Pony Show'?: Judicial Information Seeking During U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument, 1963-1965 & 2004-2009 (September 10, 2009). Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 50, pp. 101-203, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1472247

Contact Information

James Cleith Phillips (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, Students ( email )
Berkeley, CA
United States
Edward Carter
Brigham Young University ( email )
Provo, UT 84602
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 634
Downloads: 65
Download Rank: 275,120