Legal Autopoiesis Theory in Operation - A Study of the ECJ Case of C-446/03 Marks & Spencer v. David Halsey

ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA, Vol. 50, No 2, pp. 145–175, 2009

31 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2009

See all articles by Daniel Deak

Daniel Deak

Corvinus University of Budapest

Date Written: September 13, 2009

Abstract

This paper has been prepared in the hope of giving new insights into the case of C-446/03 Marks & Spencer. The author tries to explore the process of communication in the light of the legal autopoiesis theory, the final result of which is the judgment. Reading it, one can find plain arguments both for the effective protection of EC freedoms, including the freedom of establishment, one the one hand, and for stopping regulatory and tax competition, and safeguarding the national interests of Member States, on the other one. The methodology of legal autopoiesis may be useful in better understanding of the message the judgment has negotiated.

Keywords: normative closure and cognitive openness, non-restriction of fundamental freedoms, effective enforcement of rights, equivalence, fiscal cohesion, grant of a last resort, reconciliation of conflicting ideas, micro perspective of harmonisation, temporality in law, filtration

JEL Classification: K34

Suggested Citation

Deak, Daniel, Legal Autopoiesis Theory in Operation - A Study of the ECJ Case of C-446/03 Marks & Spencer v. David Halsey (September 13, 2009). ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA, Vol. 50, No 2, pp. 145–175, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1472647

Daniel Deak (Contact Author)

Corvinus University of Budapest ( email )

Fovam ter 8
Budapest, H-1093
Hungary
+36(1)4825365 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.uni-corvinus.hu/~ddeak

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
125
Abstract Views
637
rank
269,779
PlumX Metrics