On the Indivisibility of Rights: Truth Commissions, Reparations, and the Right to Development

Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal, Vol. 10, p. 141, 2007

37 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2009

Date Written: June 14, 2007

Abstract

While academics debate the ranking of rights, information from the field demonstrates their indivisibility. This Article explores how truth commissions provide rich documentation of the interrelation between violations of Civil and Political Rights (CPR) and Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ESCR), using Peru's Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as an example. The TRC's findings show how social and economic inequalities contributed to the eruption of political violence, which further exacerbated these conditions. This revelation challenged the TRC to develop a reparation plan that adequately responded to the needs of victim-survivors, while maintaining a causal link with damage caused by the conflict. Ultimately, the TRC focused narrowly on repariing damage caused by CPR violations. Yet now, almost four years later, the government confuses development with traditional reparation measures, generating criticism. The author proposes that Peru's post-conflict recovery may need to accept the overlap between reparations and development to improve the "well being" of its intended beneficiaries.

Keywords: human rights, transitional justice, development, Peru

Suggested Citation

Laplante, Lisa J., On the Indivisibility of Rights: Truth Commissions, Reparations, and the Right to Development (June 14, 2007). Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal, Vol. 10, p. 141, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1473280

Lisa J. Laplante (Contact Author)

New England Law | Boston ( email )

154 Stuart St.
Boston, MA 02116
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
278
rank
106,832
Abstract Views
1,022
PlumX Metrics