The Core-Periphery Model and Endogenous Growth: Stabilising and De-Stabilising Integration
21 Pages Posted: 17 Jun 1999 Last revised: 15 May 2023
Date Written: January 1999
Abstract
traditionally seen only in terms of trade costs, many aspects of economic integration are more naturally viewed as lowering the cost of trading information rather than goods, i.e. as reducing the extent to which learning externalities are localised. Raising learning spillovers is stabilising, so integration may encourage geographic dispersion (the traditional result is that integration tends to encourage agglomeration). This may be useful for evaluating real-world regional policies e.g. subsidisation of universities, technical colleges and high-technology industrial parks in disadvantaged regions that are aimed at combating the localisation of learning externalities. Finally we show that agglomeration of industry is favourable to growth and that this growth effect can mitigate, but not reverse, losses suffered by residents of the periphery when catastrophic agglomeration occurs.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Global Income Divergence, Trade and Industrialization: The Geography of Growth Take-Offs
-
Global Income Divergence, Trade and Industrialization: The Geography of Growth Take-Offs
-
Incremental Trade and Endogenous Growth: A Q-Theory Approach
By Richard E. Baldwin and Rikard Forslid
-
Trade Liberalization and Endogenous Growth: A Q-Theory Approach
By Richard E. Baldwin and Rikard Forslid
-
Does Geographical Agglomeration Foster Economic Growth? And Who Gains and Looses from it?
-
Spatial Agglomeration Dynamics
By Danny Quah
-
Globalization and the Evolution of the Supply Chain: Who Gains and Who Loses?