Making Markets for Merit Goods: The Political Economy of Antiretrovirals

47 Pages Posted: 25 Sep 2009

See all articles by Ethan B. Kapstein

Ethan B. Kapstein

Independent

Joshua Busby

University of Texas at Austin - Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs

Date Written: August 19, 2009

Abstract

This paper examines the role of policy entrepreneurs and global activists in shaping the international market for antiretroviral drugs to combat HIV/AIDS. When ARVs first came on the market in the 1990s they were exceedingly expensive; the cost of treatment was upwards of $10,000 per year. These drugs were thus accessible only to those patients who had high incomes. But in 2006, the “international community,” meeting at a United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS), made an astonishing pledge to those who were infected with HIV. It proclaimed that there should be universal access to ARV treatment. This UNGASS, following up on an earlier historic UN special session devoted entirely to AIDS in 2001, marked the first time in history that the international community pledged itself to chronic care for the ill, which in this case includes the approximately 30 million people around the world estimated to be HIV positive. How do we explain the transformation of ARVs from private goods, which only a few could afford, into merit goods that were (at least declaratively) to be made available to everyone? In other words, how does a norm of “universal access to treatment” - that no person should be denied these life-extending drugs - become the ethical basis for global public policy with respect to pharmaceutical allocation? What are the lessons of the ARV story for other global issues? These are the primary questions we explore in this paper. Briefly, we argue that the policy entrepreneurs and activists who promoted the creation of a universal access to treatment regime - of the transformation of ARVs into global merit goods - relied on a combination of moral arguments and ideas with favorable material circumstances. From the ethical perspective, the task of these entrepreneurs was to convince the “international community” that access to ARVs was a “human right,” or conversely to convince decision-makers that it was morally wrong to allocate these life-enhancing drugs solely on the basis of ability to pay. But from a material standpoint, these arguments were greatly facilitated by the lowering prices of ARVs caused by a combination of differential pricing (that is, lower prices for drugs in the developing world than in the advanced welfare states) and competition from generics producers, coupled with increases in foreign aid spending devoted to HIV/AIDS and other diseases.

Keywords: HIV/AIDS, ARVs, antiretrovirals, activists, policy entrepreneurs, merit goods, international community, global public

Suggested Citation

Kapstein, Ethan B. and Busby, Joshua, Making Markets for Merit Goods: The Political Economy of Antiretrovirals (August 19, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1474052 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1474052

Joshua Busby

University of Texas at Austin - Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs ( email )

2300 Red River St., Stop E2700
PO Box Y
Austin, TX 78713
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
36
Abstract Views
630
PlumX Metrics