Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Contingent Constitutionalism: State and Local Criminal Laws and the Applicability of Federal Constitutional Rights

40 Pages Posted: 1 Oct 2009 Last revised: 18 Oct 2009

Wayne A. Logan

Florida State University - College of Law

Date Written: September 29, 2009

Abstract

Americans have long been bound by a shared sense of constitutional commonality, and the Supreme Court has repeatedly condemned the notion that federal constitutional rights should be allowed to depend on distinct state and local legal norms. In reality, however, federal rights do indeed vary, and they do so as a result of their contingent relationship to the diversity of state and local laws on which they rely. Focusing on criminal procedure rights in particular, this Article examines the benefits and detriments of constitutional contingency, and casts in new light many enduring understandings of American constitutionalism, including the effects of incorporation doctrine and the nation’s mythic sense of shared constitutional commitment.

Keywords: federalism, fourth amendment, incorporation doctrine, rights, individual liberties

Suggested Citation

Logan, Wayne A., Contingent Constitutionalism: State and Local Criminal Laws and the Applicability of Federal Constitutional Rights (September 29, 2009). William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 51, pp. 143-182, 2009; FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 397. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1480415

Wayne A. Logan (Contact Author)

Florida State University - College of Law ( email )

425 W. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32306
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
67
Rank
286,972
Abstract Views
563