Procyclicality of Capital Requirements in a General Equilibrium Model of Liquidity Dependence
30 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2009
Date Written: September 1, 2009
Abstract
This paper attempts to quantify business cycle effects of bank capital requirements. The authors use a general equilibrium model in which financing of capital goods production is subject to an agency problem. At the center of this problem is the interaction between entrepreneurs' moral hazard and liquidity provision by banks as analyzed by Holmstrom and Tirole (1998). They impose capital requirements on banks and calibrate the regulation using the Basel II risk-weight formula. Comparing business cycle properties of the model under this procyclical regulation with those under hypothetical countercyclical regulation, the authors find that output volatility is about 25 percent larger under procyclical regulation and that this volatility difference implies a 1.7 percent reduction of the household's welfare. Even with more conservative parameter choices, the volatility and welfare differences under the two regimes remain nonnegligible.
Keywords: Procyclicality, capital requirements, countercyclical regulation
JEL Classification: E32, G21, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Managing Credit Booms and Busts: A Pigouvian Taxation Approach
By Olivier Jeanne and Anton Korinek
-
Managing Credit Booms and Busts: A Pigouvian Taxation Approach
By Olivier Jeanne and Anton Korinek
-
Managing Credit Booms and Busts: A Pigouvian Taxation Approach
By Olivier Jeanne and Anton Korinek
-
Overborrowing and Systemic Externalities in the Business Cycle
-
Systemic Risk-Taking: Amplification Effects, Externalities, and Regulatory Responses
-
Systemic Risk-Taking: Amplification Effects, Externalities, and Regulatory Responses
-
Real Exchange Rate Volatility and the Price of Nontradables in Sudden-Stop-Prone Economies