Research and Development in Culture: A Case for Cross Subsidies in the Arts

24 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2020

Date Written: February 10, 2009


Several types of arguments advocate state involvement in the promotion of culture. Many of them imply some sort of subsidy, usually to non-for-profit firms; none favors taxing cultural events. The tax literature, on the other side, discusses excise taxation on culture only as a way to redistribute income. However, to the extent that culture is a public good, taxing it is undesirable. Why are then excise taxes on public events extant in many countries? This paper argues that the development of profitable artists is analogous to R&D in the industrial organization literature, and that the excise taxation of public cultural events may be part of an efficient policy to fund it. Using a Stackelberg game to model the investment to develop an artist, I find that the optimal tax is a multiple of the expected surplus created by the artist that cannot be appropriated by the investor who funds her, and that progressivity plays a limited role at most.

Keywords: Excise taxes, cross subsidies, art, culture, public policy, artist development

JEL Classification: H23, H50, Z11

Suggested Citation

Jaramillo, Christian R., Research and Development in Culture: A Case for Cross Subsidies in the Arts (February 10, 2009). Available at SSRN: or

Christian R. Jaramillo (Contact Author)

Universidad de los Andes ( email )

Cra 1 No 18A-10
Of. 310 Ed. A
(+57 1) 339 4949 x 2439 (Phone)
332 4021 (Fax)


Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics