The Minimum Circuity Frontier and the Journey to Work

20 Pages Posted: 20 Oct 2009

Date Written: October 18, 2009

Abstract

People travel between places of residence and work destinations via transportation networks. The relation between selection of home and work locations has been heavily debated in the transportation planning literature. In this paper we use circuity, the ratio of network to Euclidean distance, to better understand the choice of residential location relative to work. This is done using two methods of defining origins and destinations in twenty metropolitan regions in the United States, with more detailed analysis of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota and Portland, Oregon. The first method of selection is based on actual choice of residence and work locations. The second is based on a randomly selected dataset of origins and destinations in the same regions, followed by a comparison between the two methods for these regions. The study shows circuity measured through randomly selected origins and destinations differs from circuity measured from actual origins and destinations. Workers tend to reside in areas such that the journey to work circuity is lower than random, applying intelligence to their location decisions. Consistent with traditional urban economic theory, this suggests locators wish to locate on the frontier with the largest residential lot at the shortest commute time, but in contrast with the classic model which simplifies transportation networks to be uniform, we cannot assume that all possible home-work pairs are on the frontier. This finding, developed from microscopic data not previously used for this question, reveals an important issue related to residence choice and location theory and how resident workers tend to locate with respect to network configuration in an urban context.

Keywords: network structure, travel behavior, transport geography, commuting, circuity, directness

Suggested Citation

Levinson, David Matthew and El-Geneidy, Ahmed M., The Minimum Circuity Frontier and the Journey to Work (October 18, 2009). Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 39, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1490643

David Matthew Levinson

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Ahmed M. El-Geneidy (Contact Author)

McGill University ( email )

815 Sherbrooke St. W
Room 401
Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G5 H9R-5S6
Canada
514-398-8741 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://tram.mcgill.ca

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
15
Abstract Views
343
PlumX Metrics