The Protection of Corporations from Intrusive Media: A German Perspective

eLaw Journal: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, Vol. 13, pp. 77-112, 2006

36 Pages Posted: 21 Oct 2009 Last revised: 22 May 2017

See all articles by Normann Witzleb

Normann Witzleb

Monash University - Faculty of Law; The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

When the High Court in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 refused to accept a corporation’s privacy claim, it also considered the relevant law in the US and in other common law jurisdictions. Even though the approaches to privacy adopted in these jurisdictions vary, none of them at present endorses a common law right to corporate privacy. This article complements this comparative survey by looking at the protection of corporate secrets in German law and considering what guidance it may offer for the future development of Australian law. German privacy jurisprudence is prepared to extend the constitutional and private law protection of privacy to corporations but generally attributes less weight to corporate privacy claims. It depends on the type of information, the manner in which it has been obtained, as well as the manner and purpose of publication whether a corporate privacy interest will outweigh the public interest in freedom of publication. By describing the framework of privacy protection in German law and analysing the key cases in which corporations have claimed protection of their privacy interests from intrusion by the media, this article intends to demonstrate how the concept of privacy is able to accommodate corporate privacy claims and that this may lead to more coherent outcomes. The article suggests that the future development of this area of law in Australia should take account of the jurisprudence developed in common law as well as civil law jurisdictions.

Suggested Citation

Witzleb, Normann and Witzleb, Normann, The Protection of Corporations from Intrusive Media: A German Perspective (2006). eLaw Journal: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, Vol. 13, pp. 77-112, 2006 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1490962

Normann Witzleb (Contact Author)

The Chinese University of Hong Kong ( email )

6/F, Lee Shau Kee Building
Shatin, New Territories
Kowloon, Sha Tin
Hong Kong

Monash University - Faculty of Law ( email )

Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
13
Abstract Views
282
PlumX Metrics