Conflicting Tasks and Moral Hazard: Theory and Experimental Evidence
46 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 2009
Date Written: October 23, 2009
Abstract
We study a multi-task principal-agent problem in which tasks can be in direct conflict with each other. In theory, it is difficult to induce a single agent to exert efforts in two conflicting tasks, because effort in one task decreases the success probability of the other task. We have conducted an experiment in which we find strong support for the relevance of this incentive problem. In the presence of conflict, subjects choose two high efforts significantly less often when both tasks are assigned to a single agent than when there are two agents each in charge of one task.
Keywords: moral hazard, conflicting tasks, experiment
JEL Classification: D86, C90, M54
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Simple Contracts, Renegotiation Under Asymmetric Information, and the Hold-Up Problem
-
Cadillac Contracts and Up-Front Payments: Efficient Investment Under Expectation Damages
-
Allocating Control in Agency Problems with Limited Liability and Sequential Hidden Actions
-
Allocating Control in Agency Problems with Limited Liability and Sequential Hidden Actions
-
On the Interplay of Hidden Action and Hidden Information in Simple Bilateral Trading Problems
-
The Hold-Up Problem and Incomplete Contracts: A Survey of Recent Topics in Contract Theory
-
Incomplete Contracts, the Hold-Up Problem and Asymmetric Information
-
Information Gathering, Transaction Costs and the Property Rights Approach
-
Information Gathering, Transaction Costs, and the Property Rights Approach