Why are Firms in the United States Abandoning Defined Benefit Plans?
9 Pages Posted: 30 Oct 2009 Last revised: 17 Feb 2011
Date Written: October 13, 2009
Abstract
This article investigates why many publicly listed corporations in the United States reduced or terminated the availability of defined benefit plans during 1998-2007. Firms limited benefit accruals in a variety of ways, including standard and distress terminations, freezes, and conversions to cash balance plans. While the decision to change the pension plan is related to the financial health of the sponsor, total benefit costs do not immediately decline when pension plans are frozen, as contributions to defined contribution plans increase almost immediately. However, we find that ‘freeze firms’ experience significant reductions in their projected benefit obligations of their defined benefit plans. This implies that most of the cost savings are generated from avoiding defined benefit plan accruals relating to future salary increases for current plan participants.
Keywords: Benefit Accruals, Cost Savings, Defined Benefit Plan, Pension Conversion, Pension Freeze
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Outlook for Pension Contributions and Profits in the U.S.
By Alicia H. Munnell and Mauricio Soto
-
The State of Private Pensions: Current 5500 Data
By Mauricio Soto and Marric Buessing
-
Why are Healthy Employers Freezing Their Pensions?
By Mauricio Soto, Alicia H. Munnell, ...
-
Why are Companies Freezing Their Pensions?
By Alicia H. Munnell and Mauricio Soto
-
Defined Benefit Plan Freezes: Who's Affected, How Much, and Replacing Lost Accruals
-
By Barbara A. Butrica, Howard Iams, ...
-
Pension Buyouts: What Can We Learn from the UK Experience?
By Ashby Monk
-
Risk, Institutions, and the Erosion of Old-Age Income Security