Australia’s ‘Choice of Fund’ Legislation: Success or Failure?

10 Pages Posted: 30 Oct 2009 Last revised: 3 Nov 2009

See all articles by Joshua Fear

Joshua Fear

University of Canberra - The Australia Institute

Geraldine Pace

The University of Sydney

Date Written: October 13, 2009

Abstract

Four years after the introduction of Australia’s Choice of Fund policy, this article assesses whether it is achieving its intended goals. The policy was based on the premise that by offering workers a wide choice of pension fund organizations to manage their retirement savings, competition between these funds would intensify, thereby lowering costs and improving the net performance of plan members. Our assessment leads to the conclusion that the Choice of Fund policy is not achieving its intended goals because many Australian workers are highly apathetic about their pension savings. Efforts would be better spent designing pension systems with a series of well thought-out defaults for the vast majority of workers who “choose not to choose”.

Keywords: Choice, Competition, Liberalization, Pension Fund, Superannuation

Suggested Citation

Fear, Joshua and Pace, Geraldine, Australia’s ‘Choice of Fund’ Legislation: Success or Failure? (October 13, 2009). Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, Fall 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1493326

Joshua Fear (Contact Author)

University of Canberra - The Australia Institute ( email )

LPO Box 5096
University of Canberra
Bruce, Australian Capital Territory 2617
Australia

Geraldine Pace

The University of Sydney ( email )

University of Sydney
Sydney, NC NSW 2006
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
93
rank
271,984
Abstract Views
583
PlumX Metrics