Expatriate Couples’ Adjustment: The Pros and Cons of Avoiding Interpersonal Conflict
41 Pages Posted: 24 Oct 2009 Last revised: 4 Nov 2009
Date Written: June 15, 2009
Abstract
This research examines the moderating effect of conflict avoidance on the relationship between interpersonal conflict and psychological adjustment among 56 expatriate couples at two points in time. We propose a model based on the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model - which assumes both individual and “cross-party” effects - to address simultaneously the effects of own and other’s avoidance behavior. We found substantial support for our model, in that both parties’ conflict perceptions were detrimental to their own psychological adjustment. Additionally, regarding avoidance, three factors were essential: I) role (expatriate versus expatriate partner), II) level of conflict, and III) time. First, direct and moderating effects of avoidance were only significant for expatriate partners, suggesting that expatriate partners are more sensitive to reaction to conflict than expatriates. Second, high conflict resulted in higher adjustment when avoidance was high, whereas low conflict resulted in higher adjustment when avoidance was low. Presumably, severe threats to the intimate relationship, that is, high conflict is better avoided, whereas smaller threats should be faced. Third, the findings were significant at Time 2, but not at Time 1. Implications of the findings for our understanding of expatriation are discussed.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Longitudinal Examination of the Role of Goal Orientation in Cross-Cultural Adjustment
By Yaping Gong and Jinyan Fan
-
The Role of Goal Orientation During Expatriation: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Investigation
By Mo Wang and Riki Takeuchi
-
Expatriate Adjustment: The Role of Conflict and Justice in Intimate Relationships
By Ellen Giebels, Kim Van Erp, ...