The Foreign Notarial Legal Services Monopoly: Why Should We Care?

26 Pages Posted: 31 Oct 2009

See all articles by Pedro A. Malavet

Pedro A. Malavet

University of Florida - Levin College of Law

Date Written: 1998

Abstract

This piece serves three purposes: (1) briefly to take issue with the current treatment of comparative scholarship, especially how it is ignored by main law reviews; (2) to be a succinct introduction to the Latin Notary; and (3) to point out that the adversarial ethic and notarial impartiality can co-exist and even complement one another. It presents the notary as an example of a non-adversarial ethic, in a system that has other professionals who are ruled by the adversarial ethic. It does not advocate the abandonment of the adversarial ethic, but, rather, argues that in certain legal situations a non-adversarial approach can work best.

Keywords: Comparative Law, Civil Law, Notarial Law, Legal Ethics, International Property Transactions

Suggested Citation

Malavet, Pedro A., The Foreign Notarial Legal Services Monopoly: Why Should We Care? (1998). John Marshall Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1998. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496460

Pedro A. Malavet (Contact Author)

University of Florida - Levin College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
125
Abstract Views
1,152
rank
225,882
PlumX Metrics