Repeal the Safe Harbors
20 Pages Posted: 31 Oct 2009 Last revised: 2 Apr 2010
Date Written: November 1, 2009
Abstract
The "safe harbors" excuse derivatives from much of the normal operation of the Bankruptcy Code. This exception to the normal rules is justified by fears that involvement of derivatives in the bankruptcy process will increase systemic risk. But as I and others have argued, the safe harbors themselves are likely to increase systemic risk by encouraging a "run on the bank." As Congress considers a variety of responses to the financial crisis, I argue that it is time to repeal the safe harbors. I do not advocate pulling out sections of the Bankruptcy Code and leaving the Code otherwise the same. Derivative contracts are somewhat unique. The volatility, interconnectedness and sheer magnitude of the sums of money involved make financial firms unique. As part of the repeal that I suggest, the Code would have to adapt to these realities. But the safe harbors should be repealed.
Keywords: Derivatives, chapter 11, safe harbors, ISDA, bankrupty, Lehman, AIG, systemic risk, close-out netting
JEL Classification: K22, G18, G28, G33, G38
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Derivatives and Systemic Risk: Netting, Collateral, and Closeout
By Robert R. Bliss and George G. Kaufman
-
Bankruptcy Law and Large Complex Financial Organizations: A Primer
-
Are Bank Holding Companies a Source of Strength to Their Banking Subsidiaries?
-
Derivatives and the Bankruptcy Code: Why the Special Treatment?
-
U.S. Corporate and Bank Insolvency Regimes: An Economic Comparison and Evaluation
By Robert R. Bliss and George G. Kaufman
-
Depositor Liquidity and Loss-Sharing in Bank Failure Resolutions
-
Netting, Financial Contracts, and Banks: The Economic Implications
By William J Bergman, Robert R. Bliss, ...