Measuring Performance Versus Impact: Evaluation Practices and their Implications on Governance and Accountability of Humanitarian NGOs

27 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2009 Last revised: 27 Dec 2013

See all articles by Claude Bruderlein

Claude Bruderlein

Harvard University - Department of Global Health and Population

MaryAnn Dakkak

University of California, San Francisco

Date Written: June 30, 2009

Abstract

In the context of increased scrutiny of humanitarian assistance over the past decade, issues around the accountability of international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) - and the perceived lack thereof - have been discussed widely and frequently. This reflects the recognition of both the increased relevance of INGOs and of the underlying problems associated with their role. Donor agencies in particular have become increasingly concerned with the accountability of the operational agencies they fund, who in return have put in place elaborate evaluation processes and systems. What characterizes these approaches and how are they affecting the ways agencies operate and pursue their humanitarian missions? Were agencies successful in addressing accountability deficits and in correcting the respective incentives towards positive change in humanitarian action? When examining the prevailing practices of major humanitarian INGOs, this research identified not only a general absence of critical self-reflection and meaningful concern over achieved impact, but also a remarkable resistance of the same dilemmas that triggered the call for an ‘accountability revolution’ in the first place. Highlighting considerable weaknesses in the governance of these INGOs, this article confirms also a growing frustration among humanitarian professionals themselves that, while much is measured and evaluated, it is rarely the actual impact of their work. Instead it is apparent that evaluation as it mostly takes place today reflects primarily the needs of donors; is irrelevant for serious organizational learning and programming efforts; adds considerably to the burden of local staff and partners; and does little to shed light on the roles, influence and impact of INGOs as central actors in humanitarian action and protection.

Keywords: Humanitarian assistance, INGOs, NGOs, donors, evaluation, accountability, governance, humanitarian policy, conflict research

Suggested Citation

Bruderlein, Claude and Dakkak, MaryAnn, Measuring Performance Versus Impact: Evaluation Practices and their Implications on Governance and Accountability of Humanitarian NGOs (June 30, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1497645 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1497645

Claude Bruderlein (Contact Author)

Harvard University - Department of Global Health and Population ( email )

665 Huntington Avenue
Building 1, Suite 1202
Boston, MA 02115
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.atha.se

MaryAnn Dakkak

University of California, San Francisco ( email )

San Francisco, CA 94143

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
296
rank
100,527
Abstract Views
3,527
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information