Construction, Development and Revelopment

Life and Learning, Vol. 17, p. 243, 2007

14 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2009 Last revised: 10 Mar 2017

See all articles by Richard Stith

Richard Stith

Valparaiso University School of Law

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

If a claim that appears utterly convincing to the speaker is treated as absurd by others, the speaker is likely to think those others willfully perverse. But perhaps those others simply fail to grasp some background truth that the speaker has assumed to be obvious. Rectification of their mistake can then provide a basis for unexpected agreement and for isolating those respondents who are in fact deeply hostile to the speaker’s claim. This Article suggests that many of our fellow citizens find the pro-life argument against lethal embryo research to be absurd simply because they mistakenly treat gestation as a process of construction rather than as a process of development. Only an isolated segment of those who favor such research may have abandoned our traditional shared belief in human equality and dignity. The contrast between construction and development is also used to illuminate our disagreements over abortion and euthanasia.

Keywords: Nature, Embryo, Abortion, Euthanasia, Development, Ontology

JEL Classification: B30, B31, D63, D64, H41, J17, J18, K1, K19, K39

Suggested Citation

Stith, Richard T., Construction, Development and Revelopment (2007). Life and Learning, Vol. 17, p. 243, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1498593

Richard T. Stith (Contact Author)

Valparaiso University School of Law ( email )

656 S. Greenwich St.
Valparaiso, IN 46383-6493
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
630
PlumX Metrics