Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Which Came First the Parent or the Child?

40 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2009 Last revised: 9 Jul 2010

Mary Patricia Byrn

William Mitchell College of Law

Jenni Vainik Ives

Federal District Court for the District of Minnesota

Date Written: October 30, 2009

Abstract

From the moment a child is born, she is a juridical person endowed with constitutional rights. A child’s parents, however, do not become legal parents until a state statute grants them the fundamental right to raise one’s child. The state, therefore, exercises considerable power and discretion when it drafts the parentage statutes that determine who becomes a legal parent. This article asserts that the state, through its parens patriae power, has a duty to act as an agent for children when it drafts its parentage statutes. In particular, the state must adopt parentage statutes that satisfy children’s fundamental right to legal parents at birth. This right derives from the Substantive Due Process privacy right to form intimate, familial relationships, as well as the right to intimate association and ensures that a child may develop the parent-child relationships necessary to preserve her liberty, protect her rights, and define her identity.

To guarantee children’s fundamental right to legal parents at birth, states must reform their current parentage statutes. This article argues that states must first replace all presumptions in parentage statutes with clear determinations of legal parentage at birth. Next, states must grant legal parentage of children conceived through sexual reproduction to the child’s genetic parents. For children conceived through assisted reproductive technology, states must grant legal parentage to the intended parents. By adopting statutes that assign children parents from these respective groups, states ensure that the persons who are most likely to act in the child’s best interest become the child’s legal parents. In so doing, the state fulfills its parens patriae obligation to guarantee every child’s fundamental right to legal parents at birth.

Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology, constitutional law, fundamental rights, substantive due process, right to intimate association, paternity, maternity, parentage, marital presumption, children’s rights

Suggested Citation

Byrn, Mary Patricia and Ives, Jenni Vainik, Which Came First the Parent or the Child? (October 30, 2009). Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. 62, No. 2, Winter 2010; William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 123. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1498673

Mary Patricia Byrn (Contact Author)

William Mitchell College of Law ( email )

875 Summit Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55105
United States
651-290-6478 (Phone)

Jenni Vainik Ives

Federal District Court for the District of Minnesota

No Address Available

Paper statistics

Downloads
124
Rank
193,506
Abstract Views
742