Justice Kennedy's Short-Lived Libertarian Revolution: A Brief History of Supreme Court Libertarian Ideology

45 Pages Posted: 4 Nov 2009 Last revised: 10 Nov 2009

See all articles by Stephen T. O'Hanlon

Stephen T. O'Hanlon

Temple University; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers University, Camden

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

This paper contends that Justice Anthony Kennedy did not initiate a libertarian jurisprudential revolution following Lawrence v. Texas. The article begins with an overview of constitutional fundamental rights jurisprudence and examines similarities with libertarian theory.

The paper then assesses the legal decisions of Justice Kennedy but concludes that Justice Kennedy is not a libertarian. This provides the basis for critiquing Professor Randy Barnett's assertion that Justice Kennedy was the instigator of a libertarian revolution in U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence. The fact that Justice Kennedy is not a libertarian is apparent from his reasoning in the recent partial birth abortion case, Gonzales v. Carhart. The paper concludes by questioning the practical application of rigid libertarian theory to real-world judicial decision making while, at the same time, expressing concern regarding Justice Kennedy's reasoning in Carhart.

Keywords: Constitutional law, libertarianism, liberalism

Suggested Citation

O'Hanlon, Stephen T., Justice Kennedy's Short-Lived Libertarian Revolution: A Brief History of Supreme Court Libertarian Ideology (2008). Cardozo Public Law, Policy and Ethics Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1, Fall 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1499172

Stephen T. O'Hanlon (Contact Author)

Temple University ( email )

Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers University, Camden ( email )

Camden, NJ 08102
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
80
Abstract Views
664
Rank
467,152
PlumX Metrics