The Effectiveness of Biodiversity Law

51 Pages Posted: 13 Nov 2009

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) has generated a heated debate between those who believe that the law has succeeded and those who believe that the law has failed. The resolution to that debate depends upon whether the law’s stated purposes or some other criteria provide the basis for judging a law’s effectiveness. Meanwhile, since the enactment of the ESA in 1973, biodiversity protection has received growing attention in the nations of southeastern Asia. So far, the law has been much less effective in protecting Asian biodiversity from habitat loss, commercial exploitation, and other threats, yet southeastern Asia’s biodiversity law has not faced the heated debate that characterizes discussions of the ESA in the United States. The ESA is far more successful in preserving biodiversity than its Asian counterparts. But we expect our laws to be far more successful. So the real question is not whether our laws have succeeded, but whether our expectations of the law are appropriate. This article considers these questions by comparing the legal protection of biodiversity in the United States, China, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Cambodia.

Keywords: biodiversity, China, Malaysia, Cambodia, Vietnam, Endangered Species Act, species

Suggested Citation

Nagle, John Copeland, The Effectiveness of Biodiversity Law (2009). Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, Vol. 24, p. 203, 2009; Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 09-45. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1504003

John Copeland Nagle (Contact Author)

Notre Dame Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
179
Abstract Views
914
rank
165,873
PlumX Metrics