Litigation Risk and Market Reaction to Restatements
45 Pages Posted: 14 Nov 2009 Last revised: 28 Mar 2013
Date Written: March 2, 2009
Abstract
A large negative stock price reaction to a restatement announcement could imply a particularly significant accounting error, or one made by a firm that has a relatively high probability of being sued. This paper investigates the extent to which market reactions to restatement announcements are explained by litigation risk. We model the simultaneous relationship between restatement announcement abnormal returns and litigation risk and find that about half of the -9.2 percent average restatement announcement effect is due to expected litigation costs. We also find that the significance of the accounting error does not directly affect the magnitude of the abnormal return; it only affects abnormal return indirectly because it increases the probability of being sued.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Economics of Fraudulent Accounting
By Simi Kedia and Thomas Philippon
-
The Economics of Fraudulent Accounting
By Simi Kedia and Thomas Philippon
-
The Economics of Fraudulent Accounting
By Simi Kedia and Thomas Philippon
-
The Economics of Fraudulent Accounting
By Semi Kedia and Thomas Philippon
-
By Paul Povel, Rajdeep Singh, ...
-
By Paul Povel, Rajdeep Singh, ...
-
Insider Trading Before Accounting Scandals
By Anup Agrawal and Tommy Cooper