Comparative Civil Justice: Decision According to Law in the United States, Germany and Korea: Chapter 5 - Pleading: The Matter in Controversy

38 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 2009 Last revised: 9 Dec 2010

See all articles by James R. Maxeiner

James R. Maxeiner

University of Baltimore - School of Law

Gyooho Lee

Chung-Ang University School of Law

Armin Weber

Independent

Harriet Weber

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: February 5, 2010

Abstract

This paper is superseded by a later draft of the complete book, which is available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1711003.

This is a working draft of a chapter in a book that introduces and compares civil justice systems in the United States, Germany and Korea. This chapter shows how American systems of pleading have failed either to direct parties and judges to material matters in dispute or to bound the dispute to produce fair and efficient decisions. It shows how American pleading has sung from one extreme of strictly limiting the subject matter of the lawsuit to allowing everything to be considered with unfortunate results for efficiency and privacy. The chapter shows how German and Korean systems use pleadings to guide courts in finding and resolving material issues in dispute and to bound the scope of the dispute to the substantive rights claimed by plaintiffs and thereby keeping the costs of litigation proportionate to amounts in dispute. This chapter discusses the “back-and-forth” phenomenon of litigation, that is, that facts and legal rules are mutually interdependent. Until one knows the facts, one does not know which legal rules apply to govern them. But until one knows which rules govern, one does not which facts are material. This phenomenon is infrequently recognized in any of the three systems of civil justice. It has frustrated the American system in successfully applying law, while it has not frustrated the German and Korean systems.

Suggested Citation

Maxeiner, James R. and Lee, Gyooho and Weber, Armin and Weber, Harriet, Comparative Civil Justice: Decision According to Law in the United States, Germany and Korea: Chapter 5 - Pleading: The Matter in Controversy (February 5, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1506546 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1506546

James R. Maxeiner (Contact Author)

University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )

1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States
410-837-4628 (Phone)

Gyooho Lee

Chung-Ang University School of Law ( email )

84 Heukseok-Dong
Dongjak-Gu
Seoul, 156-756
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Armin Weber

Independent ( email )

Harriet Weber

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
73
Abstract Views
1,218
rank
353,585
PlumX Metrics