Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=1507086
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Dred Scott v. Sandford


Paul Finkelman


University of Pittsburgh, School of Law; Albany Law School - Government Law Center

2006

THE PUBLIC DEBATE OVER CONTROVERSIAL SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, Melvin I. Urofsky, ed., pp. 24-33, CQ Press, 2006

Abstract:     
In this article, Professor Finkelman takes the reader through the infamous Dred Scott decision from beginning to end; he clarifies some of the often misconstrued background history and discusses some of the lasting effects of the Supreme Court decision. In challenging his owner in Federal court, Dred Scott brought the legal rights of slaves into question. While the Court decided against Scott, it became an influential stop on the road to war, and ultimately the 14th Amendment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: Dred Scott, 14th Amendment


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 17, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Finkelman, Paul, Dred Scott v. Sandford (2006). THE PUBLIC DEBATE OVER CONTROVERSIAL SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, Melvin I. Urofsky, ed., pp. 24-33, CQ Press, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1507086

Contact Information

Paul Finkelman (Contact Author)
University of Pittsburgh, School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
412-648-2079 (Phone)

Albany Law School - Government Law Center ( email )
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,637
Downloads: 1,269
Download Rank: 11,204
Citations:  2