Relocation Decisions in Canberra and Perth: A Blurry Snapshot

Australian Journal of Family Law, Vol. 14, pp. 234-258

22 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2009 Last revised: 31 May 2017

See all articles by Juliet Behrens

Juliet Behrens

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Patricia L. Easteal

University of Canberra - School of Law and Justice

Date Written: 2000

Abstract

This paper discusses the results and implications of a study of 46 reloaction [*2] decisions made over an 18 month period (July 1997-December 1998) in the Canberra and Perth registries of the Family Court of Australia. This period follows the significant relocation decision of the full court of the family court in B and B (1997) but precedes the High Court decision in AMS v AIF. The project, carried out by three feminist researchers, involved both the collection of information about the outcomes in these cases and quantitative analysis to identify possible impacts on outcomes of particular variables. Those variables included socio-demographic factors, children's wishes, aspects of the relevant relationships, reasons for the move and process/application factors. A major finding was that there were differences in outcome between the Canberra and Perth registries, with decisions in Perth more likely to result in a favorable outcome for the person proposing the move. The findings of the project are critiqued using three themes: shared parenting, violence and 'happy families'.

Keywords: Family court, violence

Suggested Citation

Behrens, Juliet and Easteal, Patricia L., Relocation Decisions in Canberra and Perth: A Blurry Snapshot (2000). Australian Journal of Family Law, Vol. 14, pp. 234-258. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1509707

Juliet Behrens

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Patricia L. Easteal (Contact Author)

University of Canberra - School of Law and Justice ( email )

Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
17
Abstract Views
377
PlumX Metrics