Overseas Acquisition Versus Greenfield Foreign Investment Which Internationalization Strategy is Better for Indian Pharmaceutical Enterprises?

ISID Working Paper No. 2006/07

70 Pages Posted: 2 Dec 2009

See all articles by Jaya Prakash Pradhan

Jaya Prakash Pradhan

Sardar Patel Institute of Economic & Social Research; Central University of Gujarat

Abhinav Alakshendra

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: August 1, 2006

Abstract

Very recently overseas acquisition and outward greenfield foreign investment have emerged as the two important modes of internationalization of the Indian pharmaceutical enterprises. This study examines the relative strengths and weaknesses of these strategies so as to suggest which between the two is a more effective internationalization strategy for the Indian pharmaceutical firms, given the nature of their ownership advantages. This analysis has been conducted in three stages. First, the internationalization process of the Indian pharmaceutical industry has been embedded into a four stage theory emphasizing on the emergence of different modes of internationalization like inward foreign investment, imports, exports, outward greenfield investment, overseas acquisition and contract manufacturing including inter‐firm strategic alliances. Second, theoretical perspectives have been developed with regard to the different ways in which greenfield investment and overseas acquisition can maximize the revenue productivity of pharmaceutical firms’ competitive advantages and/or to strengthen their competitive position. Third, case study of Ranbaxy Laboratories has been undertaken to empirically assess its experience with overseas acquisitions. The analysis indicates that the growth and internationalization of Indian pharmaceutical enterprises was critically dependent upon strategic government policies pursued in the past. The Indian experience offers a number of policy lessons to other developing countries wanting to build their domestic base in the pharmaceutical sector. Theoretical understandings indicate that acquisition is a more effective internationalization strategy than greenfield investment since the former not only provides all the benefits that the latter gives, but also several other competitive advantages important for firms’ performance in world market. The experience of Ranbaxy shows that overseas acquisitions have augmented its intangible asset bundle including distribution and market networks and have provided access to an existing market.

Keywords: Indian Pharmaceutical Industry, Foreign Investment, M&As, Trade, Strategic Alliances

JEL Classification: L65, L22, G34, F14, L2

Suggested Citation

Pradhan, Jaya Prakash and Pradhan, Jaya Prakash and Alakshendra, Abhinav, Overseas Acquisition Versus Greenfield Foreign Investment Which Internationalization Strategy is Better for Indian Pharmaceutical Enterprises? (August 1, 2006). ISID Working Paper No. 2006/07, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1515588 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1515588

Jaya Prakash Pradhan (Contact Author)

Sardar Patel Institute of Economic & Social Research ( email )

Drive-In Road, Near Doordarshan Tower,
Thaltej
Ahmedabad- Gujarat, 380 054
India
079-26850598 (Phone)
079-26851714 (Fax)

Central University of Gujarat ( email )

At/Po- Matia
Pattamundai
Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat 382029
India

Abhinav Alakshendra

affiliation not provided to SSRN