The Legal Profession's Failure to Discipline Unethical Prosecutors

29 Pages Posted: 2 Dec 2009

See all articles by Angela J. Davis

Angela J. Davis

American University - Washington College of Law

Date Written: Winter 2007

Abstract

This article explores the legal profession's failure to hold prosecutors accountable for misconduct and other ethical violations. Part I introduces the piece, providing several examples of prosecutorial power and abuse in the criminal justice system. Part II discusses prosecutorial misconduct and the inadequacy of current legal remedies. Part III argues that the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility have not provided adequate guidance to prosecutors, and that the disciplinary process has not been effective in disciplining prosecutors when they have abused their power and discretion. Part IV contends that the disbarment of Mike Nifong – the prosecutor in the Duke lacrosse case – was an aberration and that race and class issues influenced the outcome. Part V suggests that the Rules should be amended to include other forms of prosecutorial abuse, using the Genarlow Wilson and Jena Six cases as examples. Part VI proposes measures for reform, including strengthening the disciplinary process and completing the work of the ABA Ethics 2000 Commission.

Keywords: Jena Six, Genarlow Wilson, Prosecutorial Abuse, Prosecutorial Power, ABA Ethics Commission, Legal Ethics, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Prosecutor, Model Rules of Professional Responsibility

Suggested Citation

Davis, Angela J., The Legal Profession's Failure to Discipline Unethical Prosecutors (Winter 2007). Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 275, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1516003

Angela J. Davis (Contact Author)

American University - Washington College of Law ( email )

4300 Nebraska Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20016
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
374
Abstract Views
1,609
Rank
152,212
PlumX Metrics