The Changing Landscape of Blockbuster Punitive Damages Awards
American Law and Economics Review, Forthcoming
65 Pages Posted: 2 Dec 2009
There are 3 versions of this paper
The Changing Landscape of Blockbuster Punitive Damages Awards
The Changing Landscape of Blockbuster Punitive Damages Awards
The Changing Landscape of Blockbuster Punitive Damages Awards
Date Written: October 19, 2009
Abstract
This article investigates the determinants of the blockbuster punitive damages awards of at least $100 million. As of the end of 2008, there had been 100 such awards with an average value of $3.0 billion. The U.S. Supreme Court decision in State Farm v. Campbell suggested a single digit upper bound on the punitive damages/compensatory damages ratio, which reduced the annual number of blockbuster awards, the total annual value of blockbuster awards, and the punitive damages/compensatory damages ratio. Applying the 1:1 ratio from Exxon Shipping Co. et al. v. Baker et al. broadly would eliminate most of the blockbuster awards.
Keywords: punitives, punitive damages, blockbuster awards, compensatory damages, damages ratio, Exxon
JEL Classification: K40, K10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
What Did Punitive Damages Do? Why Misunderstanding the History of Punitive Damages Matters Today
-
The Changing Landscape of Blockbuster Punitive Damages Awards
-
Federal Incursions and State Defiance: Punitive Damages in the Wake of Philip Morris v. Williams
-
The Exxon Valdez Litigation Marathon: A Window on Punitive Damages
-
Judge-Jury Difference in Punitive Damages Awards: Who Listens to the Supreme Court?
-
Economic Analysis of Punitive Damages: Theory, Empirics, and Doctrine