Footnotes (167)



Bottomheavy: Legal Footnotes

Joan A. Magat

Duke University School of Law

December 1, 2009

Journal of Legal Education, Forthcoming

For decades, legal footnotes have been the deserving target of both ample criticism and self-mockery. Apart from their complaints as to footnotes’ mere existence, most critics draw a bead on the ballooning of footnote content. Some journal editors, aspiring to respond to this sound theme, hopefully inform their authors of a preference for “light footnoting.” But where does an author begin to trim, and what editor has the audacity to slash what the author (or her research assistant) has so laboriously compiled below the line? Changing our footnote habits is about benefits and costs. To gain the former, we must ante up. If criticism began the round of bidding, this article modestly raises the stakes, suggesting a rule of reason that might govern the author’s, the editor’s, and the reader’s expectations for footnotes. A gamble, perhaps, but one that might be worth taking.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: law journals, footnotes, citation

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 4, 2009 ; Last revised: December 26, 2014

Suggested Citation

Magat, Joan A., Bottomheavy: Legal Footnotes (December 1, 2009). Journal of Legal Education, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1516307

Contact Information

Joan A. Magat (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,122
Downloads: 297
Download Rank: 78,633
Footnotes:  167