Paradise Lost, Paradox Revisited: The Implications of Familial Ideology for Feminist, Lesbian, and Gay Engagement to Law

Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3, p. 589, 1993

19 Pages Posted: 21 Dec 2009

See all articles by Shelley A. M. Gavigan

Shelley A. M. Gavigan

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

Date Written: 1993

Abstract

In this article the author addresses the theoretical and political challenges issued to feminists and feminist scholarship by recent debates and litigation concerning "family" and "family-based" benefits. The argument proceeds in four parts: first, the discussion is relocated within socialist feminist theory. The implications of the qualified pro-family stance in the critiques advanced or influenced by women of colour is considered next, followed by an examination of some proposals to extend the definition of "spouse" and "family" to lesbian and gay relationships. The author is critical of both "critiques" and illustrates with reference to Canadian welfare and immigration law that feminists, lesbians, and gays must be attentive to the complex and contradictory implications of family-based strategies.

Keywords: same sex relationship, women, welfare law, spouse

Suggested Citation

Gavigan, Shelley A. M., Paradise Lost, Paradox Revisited: The Implications of Familial Ideology for Feminist, Lesbian, and Gay Engagement to Law (1993). Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3, p. 589, 1993 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1519462

Shelley A. M. Gavigan (Contact Author)

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada
416.736.5558 (Phone)
416.7365736 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.osgoode.yorku.ca/faculty/Gavigan_Shelley_A_M.html

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Abstract Views
1,185
Rank
706,434
PlumX Metrics