Macro Stress Tests and Crises: What Can We Learn?
14 Pages Posted: 4 Aug 2012
Abstract
Few, if any, of the macro stress tests undertaken before the current crisis uncovered significant vulnerabilities. This article examines the reasons for the poor performance by comparing the outcomes of simple stress tests with actual events for a large sample of historical banking crises. The results highlight that the structural assumptions underlying stress testing models do not match output growth around many crises. Furthermore, unless macro conditions are already weak prior to the eruption of the crisis, the vast majority of stress scenarios based on historical data are not severe enough. Last, stress testing models are not robust, as statistical relationships tend to break down during crises. These insights have important implications for the design and conduct of stress tests in the future.
JEL Classification: E44, G01, G17
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Macroprudential Supervision of Financial Institutions: Lessons from the SCAP
By Beverly Hirtle, Til Schuermann, ...
-
Stressed Out: Macroprudential Principles for Stress Testing
By David Greenlaw, Anil K. Kashyap, ...
-
Should Banks' Stress Test Results Be Disclosed? An Analysis of the Costs and Benefits
By Itay Goldstein and Haresh Sapra