One More Model Risk When Using Gaussian Copula for Risk Management
8 Pages Posted: 8 Dec 2009
Date Written: April 25, 2009
Abstract
Gaussian Copula as a model for default correlation has been recently criticized for a number of fallacies in its application to pricing and risk management of financial liabilities.
Here we point out an element of model risk that appears to be overlooked. When the Gaussian Copula is applied to the computation of the probability of losses concentrated in time, it can give paradoxical and misleading results, where an increase of correlation reduces the model probability of loss concentration. This behaviour is dangerous since, if not taken into account, can lead to completely wrong model stress testing.
Here we show how this behaviour can affect three practical problems: the estimation of future liquidity risk due to clustered losses, the assessment of CDS counterparty risk and the computation of dynamic value-at-risk.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Counterparty Risk for Credit Default Swaps: Impact of Spread Volatility and Default Correlation
By Damiano Brigo and Kyriakos Chourdakis
-
By Damiano Brigo and Agostino Capponi
-
Credit Default Swap Valuation with Counterparty Risk
By Yue Kuen Kwok and Seng Yuen Leung
-
By Damiano Brigo, Andrea Pallavicini, ...
-
Credit Value Adjustment for Credit Default Swaps via the Structural Default Model
By Alex Lipton and Artur Sepp
-
By Damiano Brigo, Agostino Capponi, ...
-
Dangers of Bilateral Counterparty Risk: The Fundamental Impact of Closeout Conventions
By Damiano Brigo and Massimo Morini
-
Charting a Course through the CDS Big Bang
By Johan G. B. Beumee, Damiano Brigo, ...
-
Completing CVA and Liquidity: Firm-Level Positions and Collateralized Trades
By Chris Kenyon