The War on Terror and U.S. Criminal Law

10 Pages Posted: 12 Dec 2009  

Markus D. Dubber

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law; University of Toronto - Centre for Ethics

Date Written: December 9, 2009

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of what impact the so-called “new security agenda against terrorism” has had on substantive criminal law in the United States. This question has a simple answer: None.

There is nothing new about the so-called War on Terror, except for a redesignation of its object, from Crime to Terror. The mode of governance, its essence as a “security agenda,” remains unchanged. The War on Terror is another, contemporary, manifestation of a mode of penal governance that regards itself as emanating from the sovereign’s power to police, understood here in the traditional sense of the power to maintain the peace, or, in Blackstone’s phrase, the sovereign’s power as “pater-familias of the nation” to see after “the public police and oeconomy,” i.e., “the due regulation and domestic order of the kingdom.” The security agenda against terrorism, in this sense, is neither “new,” nor can it have an “impact” on American criminal law, simply because it is American criminal law, and always has been.

Keywords: terrorism, war on terror, U.S. criminal law, war on crime

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Dubber, Markus D., The War on Terror and U.S. Criminal Law (December 9, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1521252 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1521252

Markus D. Dubber (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )

78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.utoronto.ca/faculty-staff/full-time-faculty/markus-dubber

University of Toronto - Centre for Ethics ( email )

6 Hoskin Avenue
Toronto, Ontario M5S 1H8
Canada

HOME PAGE: http://ethics.utoronto.ca

Paper statistics

Downloads
175
Rank
140,061
Abstract Views
926