Parameter Uncertainty in Asset Allocation
46 Pages Posted: 18 Dec 2009 Last revised: 18 Mar 2010
Date Written: December 17, 2009
Abstract
We revisit an investment experiment that compares the performance of an investor using Bayesian methods for determining portfolio weights with an investor that uses the Monte Carlo based resampling approach advocated in Michaud (1998). Markowitz and Usmen (2003) showed that the Michaud investor always won. However, in the original experiment, the Bayes investor was handicapped because the algorithm that was used to evaluate the predictive distribution of the portfolio provided only a rough approximation. We level the playing field by allowing the Bayes investor to use a more standard algorithm. Our results sharply contrast with those of the original experiment. The final part of our paper proposes a new investment experiment that is much more relevant for the average investor - a one-period ahead asset allocation. We examine in detail why this is the best comparison to make, and why the Bayes investor always wins.
Keywords: Bayesian decision problem, parameter uncertainty, optimal portfolios, utility function maximization, resampling
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Andrew Ang, Joseph Chen, ...
-
By Joseph Chen, Andrew Ang, ...
-
Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments
By Campbell R. Harvey, John Liechty, ...
-
Optimal Portfolio Allocation Under Higher Moments
By Eric Jondeau and Michael Rockinger
-
Optimal Portfolio Allocation Under Higher Moments
By Eric Jondeau and Michael Rockinger
-
Optimal Portfolio Choice Under Regime Switching, Skew and Kurtosis Preferences
By Allan Timmermann and Massimo Guidolin
-
Downside Correlation and Expected Stock Returns
By Andrew Ang, Joseph Chen, ...
-
Modeling Asymmetry and Excess Kurtosis in Stock Return Data
By Gamini Premaratne and Anil K. Bera
-
Is Beta Still Alive? Conclusive Evidence from the Swiss Stock Market
By Dušan Isakov