The Human Rights Committee’s Views in Sayadi v. Belgium: A Missed Opportunity
Goettingen Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, No. 3, p. 519, 2009
20 Pages Posted: 19 Dec 2009
Date Written: December 19, 2009
The article provides a critical review of the Human Rights Committee's views in Sayadi v. Belgium, a case dealing with United Nations Security Council (UNSC) terrorist blacklists. The case raised many complex issues of international law, most notably the question whether UNSC resolutions can prevail over human rights treaties by virtue of Art. 103 of the UN Charter. This issue – one of truly fundamental importance – has cropped up in several important recent cases which either addressed it or avoided it, including Kadi before the courts of the European Union, Al-Jedda before the UK House of Lords, and Behrami before the European Court of Human Rights. Regrettably, the Committee's decision did not do justice to the complexity and the gravity of the matters raised before it, as it failed to tackle the norm conflict issue head on and ignored the Charter's supremacy clause altogether. Such an approach advances neither the cause of human rights, nor the coherence of international law as a legal system.
Keywords: international law, Sayadi, Security Council, human rights, norm conflict, Article 103, Kadi, Al-Jedda, Behrami
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation